4.05.2012

Embassy Row: Marbury v. Madison redux

Embassy Row: Marbury v. Madison redux

...for a writ of mandamus boils down to a general assumption that the secretary is too busy and her work too important to be bothered with the laws of Congress and the mandates of this court,” Mr. Dinh said. “Marbury vs. Madison disposed of that argument.”...
info

Obama vs. Marbury v. Madison

...and famously taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago. But did he somehow not teach the historic case of Marbury v. Madison? That's a fair question after Mr. Obama's astonishing remarks on Monday at the White House when he ruminated for the first...
info

Wall Street Journal: Obama vs. Marbury v. Madison

...Review and famously taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago. But did he somehow not teach the historic case of Marbury v. Madison? That's a fair question after Mr. Obama's astonishing remarks on Monday at the White House when he ruminated for...
info

First the President is a bully….he started it…..and now the Judiciary ..and here is my free advice to Attorney General Holder

...Judges had the same deficient legal education that the President apparently had, the Court was specifically informed of Marbury v. Madison by the Justice Department lawyer who was before them arguing an unrelated case. I listened to the tape from the oral...
info

Greta Van Susteren: First the President Is a Bully... and Now the Judiciary -- Here Is My Free Advice to AG Holder

...unconstitutional or not. They know the answer and they know the Attorney General does (even if the president does not): Marbury v. Madison . They fired off the letter to Main Justice because they got mad at the president trying to intimidate their co-equal...
info

Ruth Marcus: Disorder in the court

...not order the president to go to the blackboard and write, 100 times, “I do believe in Marbury v. Madison . I do believe in Marbury v. Madison .” It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury, emphatically the province of the judiciary to say what...
info

Ruth Marcus: Disorder in the court

...not order the president to go to the blackboard and write, 100 times, “I do believe in Marbury v. Madison . I do believe in Marbury v. Madison .” It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury, emphatically the province of the judiciary to say what...
info

Ruth Marcus: Disorder in the court

...not order the president to go to the blackboard and write, 100 times, “I do believe in Marbury v. Madison . I do believe in Marbury v. Madison .” It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury, emphatically the province of the judiciary to say what...
info

Holder reaffirms Marbury

...or state law if they find that it conflicts with the Constitution. That principle was established by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison in 1803, and nothing in Holder’s letter questioned that precedent. At the same time, however, the Attorney General...
info

John Marshall Essay

...executive branches, made all cases before the courts subservient to the U.S. Constitution. Cases that have been heard after Marbury v. Madison, that come into question, must be interpreted through the Constitution. Uniformity of all states of the Union were...
info

Related Post